子代理驱动开发

通过为每个任务分配新的子代理来执行计划，每个任务后进行两阶段评审：先进行规范符合性评审，再进行代码质量评审。

核心原则：每个任务使用新的子代理 + 两阶段评审（先规范后质量）= 高质量、快速迭代

使用时机

digraph when_to_use {
    "Have implementation plan?" [shape=diamond];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" [shape=diamond];
    "Stay in this session?" [shape=diamond];
    "subagent-driven-development" [shape=box];
    "executing-plans" [shape=box];
    "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [shape=box];

    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Tasks mostly independent?" [label="yes"];
    "Have implementation plan?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Stay in this session?" [label="yes"];
    "Tasks mostly independent?" -> "Manual execution or brainstorm first" [label="no - tightly coupled"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "subagent-driven-development" [label="yes"];
    "Stay in this session?" -> "executing-plans" [label="no - parallel session"];
}

相较于执行计划（并行会话）：

• 相同会话（无需上下文切换）
• 每个任务使用新的子代理（无上下文污染）
• 每个任务后进行两阶段评审：先规范符合性，再代码质量
• 更快迭代（任务间无需人工介入）

流程

digraph process {
    rankdir=TB;

    subgraph cluster_per_task {
        label="Per Task";
        "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent asks questions?" [shape=diamond];
        "Answer questions, provide context" [shape=box];
        "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [shape=box];
        "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [shape=box];
        "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" [shape=diamond];
        "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [shape=box];
        "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    }

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" [shape=box];
    "More tasks remain?" [shape=diamond];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [shape=box];
    "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch" [shape=box style=filled fillcolor=lightgreen];

    "Read plan, extract all tasks with full text, note context, create TodoWrite" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" -> "Implementer subagent asks questions?";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Answer questions, provide context" [label="yes"];
    "Answer questions, provide context" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)";
    "Implementer subagent asks questions?" -> "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent implements, tests, commits, self-reviews" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)";
    "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?";
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes spec gaps" -> "Dispatch spec reviewer subagent (./spec-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Spec reviewer subagent confirms code matches spec?" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" -> "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?";
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" [label="no"];
    "Implementer subagent fixes quality issues" -> "Dispatch code quality reviewer subagent (./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md)" [label="re-review"];
    "Code quality reviewer subagent approves?" -> "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" [label="yes"];
    "Mark task complete in TodoWrite" -> "More tasks remain?";
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch implementer subagent (./implementer-prompt.md)" [label="yes"];
    "More tasks remain?" -> "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" [label="no"];
    "Dispatch final code reviewer subagent for entire implementation" -> "Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch";
}

提示模板

• ./implementer-prompt.md- 分配实现者子代理
• ./spec-reviewer-prompt.md- 分配规范符合性评审者子代理
• ./code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md- 分配代码质量评审者子代理

示例工作流

You: I'm using Subagent-Driven Development to execute this plan.

[Read plan file once: docs/plans/feature-plan.md]
[Extract all 5 tasks with full text and context]
[Create TodoWrite with all tasks]

Task 1: Hook installation script

[Get Task 1 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]

Implementer: "Before I begin - should the hook be installed at user or system level?"

You: "User level (~/.config/superpowers/hooks/)"

Implementer: "Got it. Implementing now..."
[Later] Implementer:
  - Implemented install-hook command
  - Added tests, 5/5 passing
  - Self-review: Found I missed --force flag, added it
  - Committed

[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant - all requirements met, nothing extra

[Get git SHAs, dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Good test coverage, clean. Issues: None. Approved.

[Mark Task 1 complete]

Task 2: Recovery modes

[Get Task 2 text and context (already extracted)]
[Dispatch implementation subagent with full task text + context]

Implementer: [No questions, proceeds]
Implementer:
  - Added verify/repair modes
  - 8/8 tests passing
  - Self-review: All good
  - Committed

[Dispatch spec compliance reviewer]
Spec reviewer: ❌ Issues:
  - Missing: Progress reporting (spec says "report every 100 items")
  - Extra: Added --json flag (not requested)

[Implementer fixes issues]
Implementer: Removed --json flag, added progress reporting

[Spec reviewer reviews again]
Spec reviewer: ✅ Spec compliant now

[Dispatch code quality reviewer]
Code reviewer: Strengths: Solid. Issues (Important): Magic number (100)

[Implementer fixes]
Implementer: Extracted PROGRESS_INTERVAL constant

[Code reviewer reviews again]
Code reviewer: ✅ Approved

[Mark Task 2 complete]

...

[After all tasks]
[Dispatch final code-reviewer]
Final reviewer: All requirements met, ready to merge

Done!

优势

相较于手动执行：

• 子代理自然遵循测试驱动开发（TDD）
• 每项任务都有全新上下文（无混淆）
• 并行安全（子代理互不干扰）
• 子代理可在工作前及工作中提问

相较于执行计划：

• 同一会话（无需交接）
• 持续进展（无需等待）
• 自动设立审查检查点

效率提升：

• 无文件读取开销（控制器提供完整文本）
• 控制器精准筛选所需上下文
• 子代理预先获取完整信息
• 问题在工作开始前即被提出（而非之后）

质量关卡：

• 自检机制在交接前发现问题
• 两阶段审查：规范符合性审查 → 代码质量审查
• 审查循环确保修复切实有效
• 规范符合性机制防止过度构建或构建不足
• 代码质量确保实现过程构建完善

成本：

• 更多子代理调用（每个任务需执行者+2名评审员）
• 控制器需进行更多准备工作（预先提取所有任务）
• 评审循环增加迭代次数
• 但能及早发现问题（比后期调试成本更低）

红色警戒项

严禁：

• 未经用户明确同意即在主分支上开始实施
• 跳过评审环节（规范符合性评审或代码质量评审）
• 对未修复的问题继续推进
• 并行分派多个实施子代理（会导致冲突）
• 让子代理读取计划文件（应直接提供完整文本）
• 省略场景设定背景（子代理需要理解任务所处环境）
• 忽视子代理提问（必须在允许其继续前回答问题）
• 在规范符合性上接受"基本达标"（规范评审发现的问题即代表未完成）
• 跳过评审循环（评审发现的问题需执行者修复后重新评审）
• 让实施者自我评审代替实际评审（两者都需要）
• 在规范符合性✅之前开始代码质量评审（错误的顺序）
• 在任一评审存在未解决问题时，转向下一任务

如果子代理提问：

• 清晰且完整地回答
• 必要时提供额外上下文
• 不要催促他们进入实施阶段

如果评审者发现问题：

• 实施者（同一子代理）进行修复
• 评审者再次评审
• 重复直至通过
• 不要跳过重新评审

如果子代理任务失败：

• 派遣修复子代理并附带具体指令
• 不要尝试手动修复（避免上下文污染）

集成

所需工作流技能：

• 超能力：使用git-worktrees- 必需：在开始前设置隔离的工作空间
• 超能力：编写计划- 创建此技能执行的计划
• 超能力：请求代码审查- 为审查者子代理提供的代码审查模板
• 超能力：完成开发分支- 在所有任务完成后完成开发

子代理应使用：

• 超能力：测试驱动开发- 子代理为每个任务遵循测试驱动开发

替代工作流程：

• 超能力：执行计划- 用于并行会话而非同一会话执行